In Chapter 7 in Bor’s “The Ravenous
Brain,” Bor explores the vegetative state, what he calls “living on the fragile
edge of awareness.” He talks about how when a patient is in a vegetative state,
there are all kinds of problems one can run into. First, he questions the fact
if they are even conscious. Furthermore, if so, how conscious are they? And
then there is also the issue of time. How long is a family expected to wait until
they let their loved one go? He gives the painful example of Terri Schiavo,
who’s heart had stopped and was in a coma for a while before entering a
vegetative state. What ensued was about 15 years of back and forth arguing
about whether she should be kept alive or let go. All this stemmed from the
fact that no one knew if she was conscious or if she would ever even reach a
point of consciousness and wake up from what seemed an indefinite slumber.
Now, people are trying to figure
out how to tap into the world of a person in a vegetative state. Researchers in
the University of Cambridge recently conducted a study to try and figure out
just that. They used EEG on 21 patients considered in the vegetative state or
minimally conscious as well as 8 healthy volunteers. The participants were
shown a bunch of different words while asked to attend to either the word “yes”
or “no.” They did this in a span of 30 minutes, so the researchers would be
able to see whether the patients were able to attend to the correct target
word.
Their findings were interesting, to
say the least. They found that one of the patients the doctors labeled as being
in “the vegetative state” was not only able to filter out the unimportant
information, but hone in on the words they were being asked to pay attention to,
proving he really was not in a vegetative state, and was even conscious. Before I read any other findings they had,
that in itself, was significant to me; it’s very demonstrative of how
inconsistent and uncertain current methods are for determining who is considered
in the vegetative state. Aside from that unique finding, they saw that,
overall, people considered minimally conscious or vegetative state might be
able to direct their attention to the sounds and world around them; they showed
an ability to pay attention and even follow commands. They hope that this
finding, further studies, and progress, will eventually aid in such individuals
communication with the outside world as well as better understand what is
labeled as a person in a “vegetative state.”
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/10/131031110558.htm
The research you tied Bohr's writing to is really interesting. It raises a huge dilemma with quality of life. If the state is permanent and communication remains severely limited to only brain scans, then what kind of life is that? If they will remain alive but trapped inside their own minds, it could really push the euthanasia/assisted suicide issue. On the other hand, it could also be comforting for family and friends to know that when they visit, they're still connecting with their loved one and not just an "empty shell", so to speak. I look forward to watching for future studies that approach the moral consequences or offer up new ways of improving communication.
ReplyDelete