Many research studies have attempted to stimulate human
memory with implanted electrodes. The results remained mixed, with some experiments
sharpening memory, while others muddled it. A recent study, however, showed
that the timing of the stimulation is crucial. In a 2017 New York Times article,
Benedict Carey describes a study conducted by the University of Pennsylvania’s research
team, led by Michael Kahana and Youssef Ezzyat. According to the study, well-timed pulses from
electrodes implanted in the brain can enhance memory in some people. Importantly,
the encoding of new information improves if the memory areas are "zapped" when
they are functioning poorly. In contrast, when the areas are working well, the
stimulations impair memory.
The participants were 150 people with severe epilepsy being
evaluated for surgery. Through direct neural recording, the implanted electrodes
monitored seizures, indicating whether one’s epilepsy is operable. Due to
electrodes’ placement in or near memory areas, the participants were
administered a series of memory tests. They memorized lists of words and had to
recall them after a distraction. Meanwhile, the researchers monitored the
participants’ brains for “hot spots” associated to memory encoding. The
participants engaged in memorization tests as stimulations were delivered
during low- or high-functioning brain states. The results showed that memory performance
improved 12-13% when the stimulation arrived during a low or foggy state but
decreased 15-20% when the stimulation was delivered in a good state.
These findings interestingly build upon previous memory research,
including a study by Wang et al. (2014), in which Repetitive Transcranial
Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) was found to improve memory performance by
increasing the connectivity between the hippocampus and other brain regions. Although
the current study employed intracranial electroencephalography (EEG) while Wang et al. used rTMS,
both studies stimulated the memory network during encoding and observed
improved performance. This study’s finding about the significance of precise
timing of stimulation importantly distinguishes it from past research and suggests
a new direction to explore.
Because the participants were epilepsy patients in need of
surgery and direct neural recording, the researchers were able to stimulate
deeper in the brain than studies with healthy people allow. While being a strength
of the study, this component also limits the generalizability of these
findings. Further research is needed to
determine whether this approach has potential in people with other conditions.
Nevertheless, this pacemaker-like method might show promise in helping to
reduce symptoms of dementia, head injuries, and other conditions. Stimulation during "foggy" states as opposed to high-functioning states is an intriguing finding, and the precise
timing of stimulation may be a crucial area to explore further.
No comments:
Post a Comment