The article I chose is titled Anatomy of
word and sentence meaning, which focuses on tasks that involve obtaining the
meaning of a word in isolation or in relation to a sentence. Granted many
studies have brought about an agreement as to the general areas that are
involved when it comes to comprehending words.
The data that was gathered from the article supports that the frontal
semantic areas are active before the posterior areas become active. In the
study the participants are showed a sentence with a missing word followed by a
cross fixation, the participants were examined using EEG. They focus on the
participants while reading and seeing how seeing how reading affects the
comprehension of the word or sentence that is being seen. I found it interesting that the results
showed that within the left frontal area activation were seen when a task involved
semantic classification where the frontal areas, more posterior demonstrated activation that were activated by phonological tasks, or the use of verbal
working memory. This finding is interesting because much of the literature
regarding lesions explains that semantic functions use Wernicke’s area which produces
semantic aphasia where sentences will be uttered with a typical fluency but
will not make any sense. One clue regarding how the frontal and posteriors
areas share semantic processing during activities such as listening and
reading, are through an eye movement study. This showed how a skilled reader will stay on
a word for only “300ms and the length and even the direction of the
saccade after this fixation are
influenced by the meaning of the word currently fixated”.
Posner, Michael I., and Antonella
Pavese. "Anatomy of Word and Sentence Meaning."Anatomy
of Word and Sentence Meaning 95
(n.d.): 889-905.Http://www.pnas.org/content/95/3/899.full.pdf+html. Web.
What I was also introduced to in one of my other classes is that the human brain reads words as a whole not letter by letter. So we were provided with a short story such as this one...
ReplyDelete"Aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoatnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteers be at the rghit pclae. The rset can be a toatl mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe."
And we were able to see how we could read the text with barely any problems. I found this to be quite interesting as to how easily I was able to read the text above, even though a majority of the words are misspelled.